DPR Forum

Welcome to the Friendly Aisles!
DPRF is a spin-off of dpreview. We are a photography forum with people from all over the world freely sharing their knowledge and love of photography. Everybody is welcome, from beginners to the experienced professional. From smartphone to Medium Format.

DPRF is a community for everybody, every brand and every sensor format. Digital and film.
Enjoy this modern, easy to use software. Look also at our Reviews & Gallery!

Sigma 10-20mm EX or 18-250mm

Stuart2

New Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2009
Messages
1
Hello everyone

Just joined this forum and happy to find a Sigma forum.

My wife surprised me, by purchasing a Canon 7D. She is leaving me the job of finding what lenses I want.

I have been looking around and I am interested in the Sigma 10-20mm EX lens, but thought would it be more advantageous to purchase the 18-250mm.

I understand the two lenses are different but as a beginner I am thinking could the 18-250mm do what the 10-20mm is designed for?

All advise is helpful.
Kind regards.
 
Hi.

I would suggest You to take 18-250, because it has biger range, from wide to tele. After a while you will find out what you like to photograph and what kind of lens suite you best. 10-20 is very specific lens due to its wide angle. And if youre a beginer you might find it unuseful sometimes. When you start to photograph you will find out wheather you like to take portraits, lanscape, macro, ... and the you will have to buy more equipment to fulfill your wishes.
 
+1 with Vigor....you will miss more opportunities if you get the 10-20...the 18-250 is a great walk around lens...and would be a good catch all lens when you go on trips...My 18-200 and 28-135 stay on my two IR cameras all the time..just because it will let me get a little closer....

Now like Vigor said...if you choose to go landscape there..is not a better lens...expcially for your canon crop factor of 1.6 the 10-20 becomes a 16-32 hence the 18-250 becomes a 28.8-400....

I will post some pictures to help illustrate....

First the 18-200mm at different lengths...

18mm
View attachment 1928

50mm
View attachment 1924

200mm
View attachment 1929

View attachment 1925

Now the 10-20mm

10mm
View attachment 1926

View attachment 1927


I hope this helps you out...I know it is not the same subject would probably make it better...the 10-20 is a specialized lens...I do keep it in my kit..for those wide open area shots....nothing is wider except a fisheye...

Let us know what you decide...

Tony C. :z04_cowboy:
 

Attachments

  • 50mm.jpg
    50mm.jpg
    31 KB · Views: 69
  • 200mm-1.jpg
    200mm-1.jpg
    85.2 KB · Views: 9
  • 10mm.jpg
    10mm.jpg
    85.6 KB · Views: 10
  • 10mm-1.jpg
    10mm-1.jpg
    80.4 KB · Views: 10
  • 18mm.jpg
    18mm.jpg
    101 KB · Views: 15
  • 200mm.jpg
    200mm.jpg
    114 KB · Views: 13
Back
Top