I've been shooting MF for a few years now and am researching into a means to scan the 120/220 negatives into digital format. Does anyone have suggestions based on their actual experiences with various MF scanners, e.g. the Polaroid Sprintscan 120 or EPSON Perfection 3170 or 3200? Any input about these or other MF scanners would be much appreciated!
-
Quick access all forums:Photography and Techniques Nature & Wildlife Landscape & Travel City, Street & Transportation People, Portrait & Wedding Black & White Macro & Still Life Sport & Action Everything else Editing / Hardware & Software
Assignments & Critique Images I took this week Photo Critique Challenges Challenge Discussions
Gear-Talk General Gear Talk Canon Nikon Sony & Minolta Fujifilm X System & DSLRs L-Mount Alliance MicroFourThirds (MFT) Pentax & Ricoh Medium Format Leica M, Leica R, Leica Q Other brands Contax MTF Charts, Broschures etc Information Contax & Zeiss Sigma SA/ DP/DPMerrill/Quattro Others Smartphones, P&S and Drones Adapted Lens Talk Classifieds
General stuff Announcements Forum-Help/ "Have you seen...?" Introduce yourself DPRF Cafe Suggestions regarding this forum
DPR Forum
Welcome to the Friendly Aisles!
DPRF is a spin-off of dpreview. We are a photography forum with people from all over the world freely sharing their knowledge and love of photography. Everybody is welcome, from beginners to the experienced professional. From smartphone to Medium Format.
DPRF is a community for everybody, every brand and every sensor format. Digital and film.
Enjoy this modern, easy to use software. Look also at our Reviews & Gallery!
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Medium Format SlideFilm Scanner
- Thread starter carlzeiss
- Start date
tessar_man
Active Member
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2008
- Messages
- 38
Hi,
A lot of people seem to recommend the Epson 3200 Pro, which includes LaserSoft Silverfast Ai6, a package everyone seems to recommend for optimum results (see for ex&le David Brooks in Shutterbug Sept. 2003), but then you are at $599. I would like to go with a less expensive MF scanner that also still gives decent scans of 35mm slides/negs so I extend Carlzeiss's question to other lower cost models. -Jan
A lot of people seem to recommend the Epson 3200 Pro, which includes LaserSoft Silverfast Ai6, a package everyone seems to recommend for optimum results (see for ex&le David Brooks in Shutterbug Sept. 2003), but then you are at $599. I would like to go with a less expensive MF scanner that also still gives decent scans of 35mm slides/negs so I extend Carlzeiss's question to other lower cost models. -Jan
I've been using a Linotype Saphir Ultra 2 for several years, with very god success. Scanning at 1200 dpi, wiht a bit of Genuine Fractals, it works for good BW prints up to about 11" square.
I too was interested in newer technology, and got the Minolta dimage Multi II (Scsi) for about $500 a year ago. Its better than the Linotype, but not by very much.
I haven't used the Epson, but did checkout the Imacon 343 (not cheap at all - about $5k), and it really is superior. It scans without glass (less cleaning needed) and can give you 3800 dpi, or about 27" square print without Genuine Fractals or serious re-ressing (just changing to 240-300 dpi to print). So too, the scanning quality was significantly higher - not night and day, but noteworthy. If you want, I could email or post s&les of the differences.
The one downside of the Imacon is that it really doesn't do slides very well - they have to be de-mounted. But good MF scanners are not easy to find in any case.
Geoff
I too was interested in newer technology, and got the Minolta dimage Multi II (Scsi) for about $500 a year ago. Its better than the Linotype, but not by very much.
I haven't used the Epson, but did checkout the Imacon 343 (not cheap at all - about $5k), and it really is superior. It scans without glass (less cleaning needed) and can give you 3800 dpi, or about 27" square print without Genuine Fractals or serious re-ressing (just changing to 240-300 dpi to print). So too, the scanning quality was significantly higher - not night and day, but noteworthy. If you want, I could email or post s&les of the differences.
The one downside of the Imacon is that it really doesn't do slides very well - they have to be de-mounted. But good MF scanners are not easy to find in any case.
Geoff
The answer to your question is dependent on what size final print you regularly make. For smaller prints there are many solutions which will satisfy most needs. The lower cost solutions will not however have a very broad Dmax. If you would like to extract as much shadow and highlight detail as possible, and make full use of the MF resolution printing to 3O" square or larger, you will need to generate higher quality scans. I have been using a nikon cool scan 8000 for two years with excellent results. I used to have 6000 dpi drum scans done costing $100 dollars each. Although the 4000dpi scans are not quite as sharp as the drum scans, they are of very high quality. There is not much remaining info in the transparencies that scanning with this machine does not get. This of course is operator dependent. Photoshop 7 Artistry by Haynes and Crumpler has a very good discussion of relevant parameters and considerations for scanning. Kind Regards, Gary
Geoff and Gary, Thanks for your feedback. Like Jan, I am really looking for a reasonably priced MF scanner, say between $200 and $400, realizing full well that I won't be able to get the full dynamic range as Imacon or drum scanners. My purposes are humble, i.e. not to make commercial scans to sell, but to be able to post some decent images on the web that does justice to the promise of MF. Presently, my web-posted 120/220 images are scanned from 5X5 or 5X7 prints printed from MF negs. Pathetic, huh? Judge for yourself at http://www.rollei-gallery.net/ecky.
Has anyone out there used the Epson 3179 or 3200? Best regards, Eric
Has anyone out there used the Epson 3179 or 3200? Best regards, Eric
hyper_focal
Member
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2008
- Messages
- 13
Eric,
The new Epson Perfection 4870 Pro costs $600, but is an excellent scanner that should satisfy your MF scanning needs.
Print scanning it's very fast and spot on with colours. For film scanning, Epson have supplied a good selection of film holders that should cover your needs. 35mm scans were good, but need a heavy dose of USM to get the best quality. The 4870 produced better scans than the old Nikon LS1000 (film scanner), but not as good the newer 4000 Nikon Coolscan (35 mm only).
For medium and large format scans the 4870 produced outstanding quality, certainly good enough for any professional photographer to use on their work.
The 4870 is cheaper than buying a dedicated medium format film scanner. The Digital ICE works a great on both transparencies and colour negative, this feature is going to save you a lot of retouching time
The new Epson Perfection 4870 Pro costs $600, but is an excellent scanner that should satisfy your MF scanning needs.
Print scanning it's very fast and spot on with colours. For film scanning, Epson have supplied a good selection of film holders that should cover your needs. 35mm scans were good, but need a heavy dose of USM to get the best quality. The 4870 produced better scans than the old Nikon LS1000 (film scanner), but not as good the newer 4000 Nikon Coolscan (35 mm only).
For medium and large format scans the 4870 produced outstanding quality, certainly good enough for any professional photographer to use on their work.
The 4870 is cheaper than buying a dedicated medium format film scanner. The Digital ICE works a great on both transparencies and colour negative, this feature is going to save you a lot of retouching time
I bought a 3200 after doing a bit of research on it - and then found the quality was only what you could describe at best as disapointing.
I then (too late!) talked to several people on the photo.net site and they all said the same thing - that the e3200 is overated for its use with MF. I havent bothered using it for 35mm, i have a canon 4000 which I believe is fine.
I have been told on the photo.net site that the E3200 has poor optics. i didnt find that the laser soft software helped very much. in fact i played with it and found better results with the epson software. One person described the process as taiking Zeiss image and running it through an instamatic camera. i wish i had bought the canon. All the reviews i have read so far agree it has better optics. It is a bit more expensive.
I then (too late!) talked to several people on the photo.net site and they all said the same thing - that the e3200 is overated for its use with MF. I havent bothered using it for 35mm, i have a canon 4000 which I believe is fine.
I have been told on the photo.net site that the E3200 has poor optics. i didnt find that the laser soft software helped very much. in fact i played with it and found better results with the epson software. One person described the process as taiking Zeiss image and running it through an instamatic camera. i wish i had bought the canon. All the reviews i have read so far agree it has better optics. It is a bit more expensive.
tessar_man
Active Member
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2008
- Messages
- 38
Hyper_focal
Does the Epeon 4870 come with a holder for mounted 6x6/6x4.5 sides?
Jan
"...The new Epson Perfection 4870 Pro costs $600, but is an excellent scanner that should satisfy your MF scanning needs. .."
Does the Epeon 4870 come with a holder for mounted 6x6/6x4.5 sides?
Jan
"...The new Epson Perfection 4870 Pro costs $600, but is an excellent scanner that should satisfy your MF scanning needs. .."
hyper_focal
Member
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2008
- Messages
- 13
Tessar_Man,
The 4870 scanner is supplied complete with Transparency Unit and film holders for film formats from 35mm to 5 x 4". On most flatbed scanners the transparency units are sold as an optional extra and can cost as much as the scanner.
The construction of the film holders is of a very high standard and when used correctly each kept the film perfectly flat. The 35mm strip holder has a couple of clips at the end of each strip, this stops the film from moving whilst trying to load other strips. Extra care must be exercised when closing the double strip holders, if they don't click shut properly then the holder will have a slight distortion which could result in uneven focus. On the end of each of the holders there is a raised clip, this makes lifting the holder easy and should avoid finger marks on the glass plate. The 120 holder is a vast improvement over the previous 3200 120 holder, three strips of 120 film can be loaded at a time and it can now scan a 6x12cm frame.
A complete strip of 3 - 6x6 or 3 - 6x7 or 4 - 6.45 frames could be scanned in one go.
Hope this helps...
HP
The 4870 scanner is supplied complete with Transparency Unit and film holders for film formats from 35mm to 5 x 4". On most flatbed scanners the transparency units are sold as an optional extra and can cost as much as the scanner.
The construction of the film holders is of a very high standard and when used correctly each kept the film perfectly flat. The 35mm strip holder has a couple of clips at the end of each strip, this stops the film from moving whilst trying to load other strips. Extra care must be exercised when closing the double strip holders, if they don't click shut properly then the holder will have a slight distortion which could result in uneven focus. On the end of each of the holders there is a raised clip, this makes lifting the holder easy and should avoid finger marks on the glass plate. The 120 holder is a vast improvement over the previous 3200 120 holder, three strips of 120 film can be loaded at a time and it can now scan a 6x12cm frame.
A complete strip of 3 - 6x6 or 3 - 6x7 or 4 - 6.45 frames could be scanned in one go.
Hope this helps...
HP